Case Summary
Bindhu Pathrose is the plaintiff in this case against The South Indian Bank Ltd and its Authorized Officer. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit came up before me for hearing on 30/08/2024 in the presence of the above said counsels and the Court on the same day delivered the following :- JUDGMENT Plaintiff absent. No representation. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bindhu Pathrose
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The South Indian Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Authorized Officer, The South Indian Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hybin Jose P.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Charles Devassy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mathew P Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bindhu Pathrose vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Bindhu Pathrose vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding default dismissal