Case Summary
Biju.C.V. and Molly.T. are involved in a legal dispute regarding a suit and counter claim. Both parties reached a compromise agreement which was deemed legally enforceable.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed both the suit and counter claim in terms of the compromise agreement presented by the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Terms of compromise appears to be legally enforceable.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit as well as counter claim decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Biju.C.V.
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Molly.T.
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Madhu Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S.N.Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit as well as counter claim decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Suit decreed as per compromise agreement. Terms of compromise appears to be legally enforceable.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Biju.C.V. vs Molly.T. regarding Suit and counter claim
Case Code Year
Case between Biju.C.V. vs Molly.T. regarding Suit and counter claim