Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 922/2019

Case between Bhuvanan et al vs K.S.Suma et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-13
Duration
Case Code No.
922
Case Closed
Tue, 08/13/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Bhuvanan and Vinod, were involved in a suit against the defendants, K.S.Suma, Manoj, Binoy, and Alies. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented and there was no proof affidavit filed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented and there was no proof affidavit filed.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Supporting Evidence
Hence this court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bhuvanan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S.Suma
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoj
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binoy
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alies
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jathin Das.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prakash.T.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sumodh Madhavan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sangeeth.C. Subramanian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest to proceed.
Evidence:
this court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the case. Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/13/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won