Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S.No.1312/2022

Case between Beena.J. vs Kiran regarding suit filed under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
II Additional Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Beena.J. is the plaintiff seeking relief against Kiran, the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff and the failure to pay the required court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and failed to represent the case or pay the balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaintiff rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Beena.J. (41 years years) W/o Venu.R.P., Thazhevila Puthen Veedu, Velamkonam, Kottamkara, Perumpuzha, Kollam, Pin – 691 504.

Defendants

Kiran (50 years years) S/o late A.K. Radhamani, Thekkumthala, Azad Road, Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaintiff rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases