Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 892/2022

Case between Bank of India vs Bibin Mathew et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of India suing Bibin Mathew and Francis K.F for recovery of a personal loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan and were declared exparte due to non-appearance.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 2,50,580/- with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants directed to pay Rs. 2,50,580/- with 9% interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,580/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty thousand five hundred and eighty only) with 9% interest per annum from 31.05.2022 till date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bank of India (Age not specified years) Head Office at Star House, C-5, G-Block, Bandra – Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 051

Defendants

Bibin Mathew (36 years) Chakkalackal house, Chammini road, Kaloor P.O, Ernakulam District – 682 017 Francis K.F (54 years) Kalappurackal house, Vytilla, kochi – 682 019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested to recover an outstanding amount from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,580/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Application cum proposal form for personal loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the unchallenged proof affidavit and helps to establish the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Master facility Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions under which the loan was provided.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the borrower's promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Deed of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the second defendant is a guarantor for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photocopy of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that a legal notice was sent to the defendants regarding the default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Declaration cum undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines additional obligations or confirmations by the borrower.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: True copy of statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/26/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases