Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 892/2022

Case between Bank of India vs Bibin Mathew et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-23
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 01/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of India suing Bibin Mathew and Francis K.F for recovery of a personal loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan and were declared exparte due to non-appearance.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 2,50,580/- with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants directed to pay Rs. 2,50,580/- with 9% interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 2,50,580/- with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,580/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty thousand five hundred and eighty only) with 9% interest per annum from 31.05.2022 till date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bibin Mathew
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Francis K.F
Party Age
54
Relation
Cheeku
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Application cum proposal form for personal loan, Original Master facility Agreement, Original Demand Promissory note, Original Deed of Guarantee, Photocopy of notice, Copy of Declaration cum undertaking, True copy of statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nagaraj Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saijo Hassan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benoj C Augustin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.N.Muhammed Thanveer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bincy Job
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.Krishna Ozhakkanat
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested to recover an outstanding amount from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,580/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Application cum proposal form for personal loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the unchallenged proof affidavit and helps to establish the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Master facility Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions under which the loan was provided.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the borrower's promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Deed of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the second defendant is a guarantor for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photocopy of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that a legal notice was sent to the defendants regarding the default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Declaration cum undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines additional obligations or confirmations by the borrower.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: True copy of statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of India vs Bibin Mathew et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of India vs Bibin Mathew et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/26/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won