Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 328 of 2019

Case between Bank of India vs A.M Kalam regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-12
Duration
approximately-7 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Bank of India filed a suit against A.M Kalam for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant defaulted on the repayment leading the bank to take legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the owed amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,51,912 together with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the owed amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff was entitled to a decree based on the unchallenged evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff was entitled to a decree based on the unchallenged evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and from Exts.A1 to A10 documents the plaint averments stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,51,912...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of India
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.M Kalam
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for loan, Loan sanction letter, Demand Promissory Note, Bearer letter, Installment letter, Hypothecation cum loan agreement, Composite agreement, Photocopy of RC Book, True copy of legal notice, Computer printout of statement of account from 11.03.2016 to 07.03.2019
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Umarani M.N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,51,912 along with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,51,912... from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
B) The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the application made by the defendant for the loan sanctioned by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the sanctioning of the loan amount to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant agreed to repay the loan amount through this promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bearer letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Installment letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the installment repayment schedule for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Hypothecation cum loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement hypothecates the purchased vehicle as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Composite Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document states that the demand promissory note serves as continuing security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Photocopy of RC Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the vehicle financed by the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: True copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the legal notice sent to the defendant regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the transactions related to the loan account from the date of loan to the date of judgment.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of India vs A.M Kalam regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of India vs A.M Kalam regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/11/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won