Case Summary
The petitioner is Bank of Baroda, represented by its Chief Manager. The respondents are M/s.Charms Beauty Parlour and its proprietor Sangeetha.V. The case involves a petition to set aside an earlier order and restore a previous matter to the file.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and no representation was made before the court.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner absent and no representation was made.
Petitioner absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner absent and no representation was made.
Petitioner absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent and no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s.Charms Beauty Parlour
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sangeetha.V
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Injakkal D.Pramod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
This petition is filed by the Petitioner/plaintiff under Order 9 Rule 9 and Sec.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order dated 29-03-2025 and to restore the RP 29/25 on file.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside an order
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside an order