Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 621/2022

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Deepthy Anurag regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-24
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda seeking repayment of loans from Deepthy Anurag, who failed to repay the borrowed amounts. The court found in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's non-appearance and acknowledgment of liability.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.7,85,646/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their claim through unrebutted evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their claim through unrebutted evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A15 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff. In the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof of plaint claim, I learn that same remains uncontroverted and accordingly admitted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.7,85,646/- (Rupees seven lakhs eighty five thousand six hundred and forty six only) from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
represented by its Chief Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepthy Anurag
Party Age
41
Plaintiffs Documents
Original sanction letter No. 16.12.2017, Loan agreement cum hypothecation deed No. 16.12.2017, Acknowledgment letters dated 10.01.2019 and 30.03.2019.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh G. Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa N.U.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.7,85,646/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.7,85,646/- (Rupees seven lakhs eighty five thousand six hundred and forty six only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest on the sum from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
2. Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 11.30% per annum for Rs.7,85,646/- from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3. Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.7,85,646/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
4. Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction letter for the term loan issued by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction letter for the working capital loan issued by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan agreement cum Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff in the term loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan agreement cum Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff in the working capital loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction letter issued by the plaintiff while the working capital loan was renewed.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of liability in the Term Loan account issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of liability in the Working Capital Loan account issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of liability in the Term Loan account issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of liability in the Working Capital Loan account issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Office Copy of Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding the balance amount from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt for the lawyer's notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account for the term loan for the specified period along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account for the working capital loan for the specified period along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Non-starter report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report issued by Secretary, Ernakulam District Legal Service Authority.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Judgment in unnumbered C.S of 2022 issued by the Commercial Court.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Deepthy Anurag regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Deepthy Anurag regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 12/16/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won