Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O S 291/2024

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Aswathi Ajith et al regarding refund of court fee.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Aswathi Ajith and Jalajamani. The matter was settled in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement reached in mediation, entitling the plaintiff to a refund of court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement reached in mediation, entitling the plaintiff to a refund of court fee.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aswathi Ajith
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jalajamani
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report, Compromise agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Varghese K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johny K. Manipadam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju.V. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bhama Paramesaran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Aswathi Ajith et al regarding refund of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Aswathi Ajith et al regarding refund of court fee.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom, Kottayam District, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anand Vijayan regarding default dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Vaikom
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Vinod.S regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Thalayolaparambu Branch vs Shijin Daniel, Sabeena et al regarding suit dismissal.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Mathew @ Roy Thomas, George Joseph regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Littiya Thomas et al regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won