Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.560/2020

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Surabhi Jayan regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-30
Duration
approximately-8 years 4 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bank of Baroda, issued a loan to the defendant, Surabhi Jayan, for the purchase of a two-wheeler. The defendant failed to repay the loan as agreed, leading to the plaintiff taking legal action to recover the owed amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount owed by the defendant along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 13,796.51/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged proof of the loan agreement and the defendant's acknowledgment of liability.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 13,796.51/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Six and Five One paisa) from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) (Age not specified years) Santha Lodge Building, Post Office Link Road, Broadway, Ernakulam – 682 031

Defendants

Surabhi Jayan (47 years years) Erinmmal House, Master Link Road, Vaduthala, S.O. Ernakulam-682023

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff by virtue of unchallenged proof affidavit and the documents Ext. A1 to A5 have proved her case and therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get the decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The sanction letter evidences the approval of the loan amount to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan agreement cum Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan agreement documents the terms under which the defendant received the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment letter shows the defendant acknowledged her debt.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lawyer's notice served as a demand for payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement outlines the outstanding liability of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 09/29/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases