Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 888/2023

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Nima T G @ Nima Sumesh, Mini Antony regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda suing Nima T G and Mini Antony for loan repayment. The defendants failed to repay a loan taken for purchasing tailoring machines and have been declared in default.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to repay the outstanding loan amount with interest. Additionally, the court directed that the defendants' personal liability and their assets are accountable for satisfying the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.76,043.98/- along with specified interest to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to repay the outstanding loan amount with interest. Additionally, the court directed that the defendants' personal liability and their assets are accountable for satisfying the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case based on unchallenged evidence and the defendants' acknowledgment of debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case based on unchallenged evidence and the defendants' acknowledgment of debt.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.76,043.98/- with interest from defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.76,043.98/- (Rupees seventy six thousand forty three and ninety eight paise only) along with interest @13.35% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank)
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nima T G @ Nima Sumesh
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini Antony
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction letter dated 20.03.2019, Loan agreement cum hypothecation deed dated 21.03.2019, Letter of guarantee dated 21.03.2019, Letter of acknowledgment of debt dated 10.08.2021, Lawyer notice dated 19.01.2023, Postal receipts (3 nos) dated 24.01.2023, Statement of account for the period from 21.03.2019 to 08.08.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh G Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa N U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.76,043.98/- with interest from defendants.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay interest on the amount due.
Evidence:
Defendants shall pay interest at the rate of 13.35% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the sanction of the loan amount by the plaintiff bank to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan agreement cum Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the loan agreement executed by the first defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the guarantee executed by the second defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the defendants' acknowledgment of their debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the plaintiff bank to the defendants demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts document the communication sent to the defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the account details and transaction history from the loan's initiation to the judgment date.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Nima T G @ Nima Sumesh, Mini Antony regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Nima T G @ Nima Sumesh, Mini Antony regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/20/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won