Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 652/2024

Case between Bank Of Baroda et al vs Athul Vijay regarding refund of court fee

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a suit filed by Bank Of Baroda against Athul Vijay. The court found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement, which is considered lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement, which is considered lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in accordance with mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank Of Baroda
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Athul Vijay
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aneesh K M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh Kumar K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileep Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
VP Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in accordance with mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed in accordance with mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fee as per Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fee as per Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank Of Baroda et al vs Athul Vijay regarding refund of court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Bank Of Baroda et al vs Athul Vijay regarding refund of court fee

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won