Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 398/2023

Case between Baby vs Kuttan et al regarding appointment of Advocate Commissioner

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Baby, aged 56, is involved in a legal suit against defendants Kuttan and Prasad regarding the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for fair adjudication. The court ordered the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note necessary particulars with assistance from a surveyor.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to note particulars necessary for fair adjudication of the suit. The costs for the Advocate Commissioner and surveyor were specified.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner and surveyor for noting particulars.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to note particulars necessary for fair adjudication of the suit. The costs for the Advocate Commissioner and surveyor were specified.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that an Advocate Commissioner was necessary for fair adjudication.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that an Advocate Commissioner was necessary for fair adjudication.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the particulars required to be noted are necessary for the fair adjudication of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an Advocate commissioner with the assistance of surveyor is to be appointed to note the particulars required to be ascertained.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V K Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Baby vs Kuttan et al regarding appointment of Advocate Commissioner
Case Code Year
Case between Baby vs Kuttan et al regarding appointment of Advocate Commissioner

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won