Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 398/2023

Case between Baby vs Kuttan et al regarding appointment of Advocate Commissioner

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Baby, aged 56, is involved in a legal suit against defendants Kuttan and Prasad regarding the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for fair adjudication. The court ordered the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note necessary particulars with assistance from a surveyor.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to note particulars necessary for fair adjudication of the suit. The costs for the Advocate Commissioner and surveyor were specified.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner and surveyor for noting particulars.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that an Advocate Commissioner was necessary for fair adjudication.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an Advocate commissioner with the assistance of surveyor is to be appointed to note the particulars required to be ascertained.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Baby (56 years) Puravathan (Porothan) House, Koodalappadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Kuttan (Age not specified years) Nedumbilly House, Koodalappadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. Prasad (Age not specified years) Nedumbilly House, Koodalappadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683544.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases