Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.368/2019

Case between Azees et al vs Safiya regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-05-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Azees, Ramla, and N.A. Muhammed are involved in this case against the defendant Safiya. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the third plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the third plaintiff, who did not have representation in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because the third plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Azees (58 years years) Nainukunnel House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. Ramla (45 years years) Nainukunnel House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. N. A Muhammed (27 years years) Nainukunnel House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk.

Defendants

Safiya (43 years years) Vadakkath House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom village, Kunnathunadu taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to the absence of Plaintiff No.3.
Evidence:
Plaintiff No.3 absent. No representation. Hence, suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases