Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.368/2019

Case between Azees et al vs Safiya regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-05-31
Duration
Case Code No.
368
Case Closed
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Azees, Ramla, and N.A. Muhammed are involved in this case against the defendant Safiya. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the third plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the third plaintiff, who did not have representation in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the third plaintiff, who did not have representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because the third plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed because the third plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed because the third plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Azees
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. A Muhammed
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. T Soman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to the absence of Plaintiff No.3.
Evidence:
Plaintiff No.3 absent. No representation. Hence, suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won