Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 64 of 2017

Case between Asokan vs Cheruman et al regarding injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit for injunction filed by Asokan against Cheruman and others. The court determined it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court concluded that it does not have the jurisdiction to hear the case. Therefore, the plaint was returned for presentation before the proper court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that it lacked territorial jurisdiction.

Judgment Evidence:

On perusal of records it is learnt that this court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this plaint. Hence returned under Order VII, Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code for presenting before proper court.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Asokan (52 years years) Ponnarath Palliyalil House

Defendants

Cheruman (60 years years) Kalarikkal House, Tirurangadi Amsom, Tirurangadi Desom and Post. Lenin (42 years years) Ponnarath Palliyalil House, Klari Amsom, Desom, Edarikkode Post, Tirurangadi Taluk. Latha (44 years years) Ponnarath Palliyalil House, Klari Amsom, Desom, Edarikkode Post, Tirurangadi Taluk. K. Lakshmi (73 years years) Ponnarath Palliyalil House, Klari Amsom, Desom, Edarikkode Post, Tirurangadi Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for injunction.
Evidence:
On perusal of records it is learnt that this court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this plaint.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases