Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No. 186/2023

Case between A.Shajahan vs Shibu et al regarding restoration of suit OS.No. 875/2018

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
approximately-7 years 13 days
Case Code No.
186
Case Closed
Tue, 10/17/2023 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves A.Shajahan as the plaintiff seeking to restore the suit OS.No. 875/2018 which was rejected due to non-payment of court fees. The defendants, including Shibu and Shahul Hameed, remained absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to restore the suit OS.No. 875/2018 for the interest of justice, as the defendants remained absent and no objections were filed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to restore the suit OS.No. 875/2018 for the interest of justice, as the defendants remained absent and no objections were filed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed to meet the ends of justice, as the application was filed in time.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed to meet the ends of justice, as the application was filed in time.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner/plaintiff to proceed with the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, in order to meet the ends of justice, the petition is allowed. Since the respondents remained exparte. No costs ordered.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.Shajahan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thampi.V.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit on file.
Evidence:
Hence, inorder to meet the ends of justice, the petition is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 10/17/2023 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan.G., Gopalakrishnan regarding restoration of suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Anila Anilkumar regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prasanna.P.L vs Shajimon.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rani Chandrika vs Aneesh regarding setting aside an order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won