Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff Arun against Baisil Perera and Astin Perera for the realization of money. The court addressed the matter but found that no balance court fee had been remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the non-remittance of balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds concerning court fee requirements.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds concerning court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court Fee remitted so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arun
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baisil Perera
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Astin Perera
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.K.Reghupalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Remya Reghupalan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Harisankar.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Arun vs Baisil Perera et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Arun vs Baisil Perera et al regarding Realisation of Money