Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 171 OF 2015

Case between A.P.Sudakaran vs Sulthan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-08-31
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Sudakaran sought permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction of a way he used for 24 years for ingress and egress to his property by defendants Sulthan and Nafeesa.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing plaintiff's access to his property via the way used for 24 years.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing plaintiff's access to his property via the way used for 24 years.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved his case through affidavit and documents, demonstrating his right to the pathway, resulting in the injunction against defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff proved his case through affidavit and documents, demonstrating his right to the pathway, resulting in the injunction against defendants.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff proved his case through affidavit and documents, demonstrating his right to the pathway, resulting in the injunction against defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit decreed the defendants to be permanently restrained from obstructing or committing any wastage to the plaint B schedule property and interfering with plaintiff's easementary rights.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.P.Sudakaran
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o Aramughan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulthan
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Palapra Nafeesa
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o Sulthan, D/o Palapra Aboobacker
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswabharan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o Ravunni @ Raman kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Partition Deed, Certified copy of Jenm Assignment Deed, Petition to District Collector, Acknowledgement Receipt of Petition
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Anil Lal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. E.C.Suresh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are permanently restrained from obstructing or committing waste to the pathway and interfering with plaintiff's easementary rights.
Evidence:
The suit decreed the defendants to be permanently restrained from obstructing or committing any wastage to the plaint B schedule property and interfering with plaintiff's easementary rights.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's ownership of the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal transfer of property rights
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
District Collector petition for related issue
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of petition submission
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C3
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Property dispute
Case Code
Case between A.P.Sudakaran vs Sulthan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between A.P.Sudakaran vs Sulthan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00
From
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Punnasseri Krishanankutty et al vs Padath Peediyekkal Sainudheen et al regarding permanent injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction Plaintiffs
Case between Mepparambil Abu et al vs Pulikkal Hassinar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandath Valappil Nafeesa and Others vs Thakarapeediyekkal Muhammedali et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Yoosaf Ali vs Abdul Salam regarding encroachment and right of way
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasantha et al vs Chembayil Kadeeja et al regarding Right of Way Injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Plaintiff Won