Case Summary
Antony is the complainant and Thulasidas is the accused. The case revolves around allegations under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the complainant's absence and failure to produce necessary evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant absent. Represented. Death certificate of accused is not produced. Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence. Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Antony
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thulasidas
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Death certificate of accused
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- K.S. Ninan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Rahul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Evidence:
Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act