Case Summary
The case involves a petition by Ajithkumar for lifting an attachment order. The respondent, Antony, endorsed no objection to the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Attachment lifted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for lifting the attachment was allowed after the respondent endorsed no objection.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court noted that the respondent endorsed no objection.
The court noted that the respondent endorsed no objection.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court noted that the respondent endorsed no objection.
The court noted that the respondent endorsed no objection.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the respondent endorsed no objection.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Petition allowed. Attachment lifted hereby and issue Order by hand.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Antony
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajithkumar
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jimmy P.Antoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.C. Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vishnudathan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition for lifting attachment allowed.
Evidence:
Hence Petition allowed. Attachment lifted hereby and issue Order by hand.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Antony vs Ajithkumar regarding lifting attachment
Case Code Year
Case between Antony vs Ajithkumar regarding lifting attachment