Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.210/2022

Case between Anoop P H et al vs Sadique et al regarding License period

Court
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves Anoop P H and others as plaintiffs, Sadique and others as defendants. The suit became infructuous due to the license period being over.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Suit dismissed as infructuous since the license period was over.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. Counsel submitted that license period is over. Hence, the suit became infructuous. Defendant present. Since the suit became infructuous, suit dismissed as infructuous.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Anoop P H (33 years years) Pirambillykudy House, Vengola P O, Chelakkulam Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Jamshad (37 years years) Ullattukudy House, Vengola P O, Chelakkulam Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Jithnam P Jalal (30 years years) Panakkattu House, Vengola P O, Chelakkulam Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Others (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Sadique (30 years years) Pirambillykudy House, Vengola P O, Chelakkulam Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683556 Abbas (60 years years) Pirambillykudy House, Vengola P O, Chelakkulam Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683556 Others (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed as infructuous
Evidence:
Since the suit became infructuous, suit dismissed as infructuous.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases