Case Summary
The petitioner seeks to identify and report on alleged encroachment made by the respondent over a common pathway, which is a point of contention between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
Petitioner's application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner and Surveyor allowed to identify the alleged encroachment and report on the properties.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
null
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aliyar
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o. Pareekutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mammoonju
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o. Pareekutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pathway demarcation for use by children and access to Panchayat road
Reference:
Document Type:
Village Officer measurement
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Disputing existence of pathway and opposing appointment of commission
Reference:
Document Type:
Legal precedent
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Respondent's objection on maintainability of commission
Reference:
Madhavan V. Narayanakutty [2019 (4) KLT 208]
Document Type:
Judgment
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner for property inspection
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aliyar vs Mammoonju regarding alleged encroachment of common pathway
Case Code Year
Case between Aliyar vs Mammoonju regarding alleged encroachment of common pathway