Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 631/2023

Case between Annapoorneswari M G vs Deputy Tahsildar et al regarding injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-08-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Annapoorneswari M G filed a suit for injunction against the Deputy Tahsildar and the State of Kerala related to revenue recovery proceedings. The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendants from continuing with these proceedings due to her inability to pay the court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the suit was not maintainable and dismissed it, stating the jurisdictional bar under the Revenue Recovery Act. Hence, the plaintiff's request for injunction was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the suit was not maintainable and dismissed it, stating the jurisdictional bar under the Revenue Recovery Act. Hence, the plaintiff's request for injunction was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The court held that the suit was barred by jurisdiction under the Revenue Recovery Act.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By virtue Section 72 of the Revenue Recovery Act, there is bar for the Civil court to entertain the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is not maintainable.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annapoorneswari M G
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deputy Tahsildar, Revenue Recovery Department
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Of Kerala, Represented by District Collector
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S Gopika
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saji Koduvathu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Silpa Sam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from continuing with the Revenue Recovery proceedings.
Evidence:
In the result, Suit is not maintainable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Revenue Recovery proceedings initiated
Case Code
Case between Annapoorneswari M G vs Deputy Tahsildar et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Annapoorneswari M G vs Deputy Tahsildar et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/23/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Mary Thomas et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding bore well digging
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Biju M R vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sanumon P S vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissed suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Valsamma Varghese vs State Of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won