Case Summary
The plaintiff, Ammster Immigration Overseas, is seeking compensation for breach of contract against the defendant, Anu Francis, who failed to serve notice and left the firm without proper handover of client data. The defendant did not appear in court to respond to the claims.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay ₹4,92,895 with interest at 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff ₹4,92,895 with interest for the breach of contract. The plaintiffs are also entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their case without rebuttal from the defendant.
The evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their case without rebuttal from the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their case without rebuttal from the defendant.
The evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their case without rebuttal from the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiffs. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of ₹4,92,895 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ammster Immigration Overseas
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anu Francis
Plaintiffs Documents
Attested copy of Employment Contract, Print out of the email communication of registration by the defendant, Print out of the email communication of HR Manager of the Plaintiff, Copy of the Advocate Notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment Card, Copy of the reply notice, Certificate of UDYAM Registration, Power of Attorney
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Sarathkrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Asha Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Damages
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed ₹4,92,895 as damages with future interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of 4,92,895₹/ (Rupees Four Lakh Ninety Two Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety Five only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Employment Contract
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested copy of the employment contract between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Email Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Print out of the email communication of registration by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Email Communication
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Print out of the email communication of HR Manager of the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Advocate Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the advocate notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card related to the communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the reply notice dated 29.09.2023 sent by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Udyam registration certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate of UDYAM registration.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Power of attorney related to the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ammster Immigration Overseas vs Anu Francis regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ammster Immigration Overseas vs Anu Francis regarding realization of money