Case Summary
Ameena filed a suit against Pathumuthu for the realization of money. The court delivered a judgment on the matter after hearing both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application and the plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA 5/25 dismissed. BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ameena
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathumuthu
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chithra B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gokul P. Raj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aboobaker Kutty. A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's request was rejected.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Ameena vs Pathumuthu regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ameena vs Pathumuthu regarding realisation of money