Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.347/2023

Case between Ambily. R. @ Ambili Ramachandran vs Mathai @ Alex Mathew et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration
Case Code No.
347
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Ambily R. @ Ambili Ramachandran, was represented by her Power of Attorney holder in a suit against Mathai @ Alex Mathew and Jayakrishnan M.S. The case involves a dismissal for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file necessary documents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file necessary documents.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to show up and provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to show up and provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in adducing evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ambily. R. @ Ambili Ramachandran
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathai @ Alex Mathew
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakrishnan.M.S.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajay.N.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Babykuttan.K.C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh.T.S.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghesekutty.K.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaya.D.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Neeraj.T.N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won