Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 99/2020

Case between Ambika vs Mohanan et al regarding settlement of civil dispute.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ambika is the plaintiff, and Mohanan along with others are the defendants in this case. The matter involved has been settled in mediation, and the court confirmed the terms of compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled in mediation and the terms of the compromise were found to be legally enforceable. The suit was decreed based on the compromise terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled in mediation and the terms of the compromise were found to be legally enforceable. The suit was decreed based on the compromise terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled in mediation and the terms were legally enforceable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled in mediation and the terms were legally enforceable.
Supporting Evidence
Mediation report filed along with compromise petition. Terms of compromise appeared to be legally enforceable.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ambika
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
61
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Omana
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ushadevi
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyamala
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vishnu
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.N. Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D. Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.R. Pramod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Sambath Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Matter settled in mediation. Mediation report filed along with compromise petition. Terms of compromise appeared to be legally enforceable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ambika vs Mohanan et al regarding settlement of civil dispute.
Case Code Year
Case between Ambika vs Mohanan et al regarding settlement of civil dispute.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won