O.S. No.468/2019

Case between Ambika vs Achara Kannan et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court

THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR

Judge

Smt. Sumey Chandran

Order Date

2025-08-06

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Ambika is involved in a suit against Achara Kannan and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and there was no representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ambika
Party Age: 49
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Achara Kannan
Party Age: 78
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ammini
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Karunakaran
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Madhavan
Party Age: 41
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Subhadra
Party Age: 39
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Babu T Cherian
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Ancy Lilla Lazer
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K A Benny
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Ciju I S
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Evidence: