Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 348 OF 2018

Case between Ali vs Kadiya Umma et al regarding partition

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partition dispute between Ali and the defendants, who are family members. The plaintiff seeks a partition of inherited property that they claim jointly with the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff and a final decree for partition was passed. The schedules were allotted to both the plaintiff and defendants as per the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the compromise was lawful and reasonable.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed and a final decree for partition is passed on the basis of Razi as follows:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ali (55 years years) Tirur amsom Kott desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Kadiya Umma (85 years years) Ummerkutty (57 years years) Kadeeja (48 years years) Subaida (48 years years) Musthafa (46 years years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition was granted based on the settlement.
Evidence:
Therefore, compromise is recorded in view of I.A. No. 1827/2019. Hence the suit is decreed and a final decree for partition is passed on the basis of Razi.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Razi Petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The document outlines the terms of the settlement reached between the parties regarding the partition.
Reference:
I.A.No.1827/2019
Document Type: Genealogical table
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the relationships between the plaintiffs and defendants which is relevant for the partition case.
Reference:
Plaint A schedule
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This deed establishes the ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
No. 87/1979
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is also critical in establishing the ownership of another property sought to be partitioned.
Reference:
807/1970

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases