Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.215/2020

Case between Akhil P.C. vs Kochummani regarding suit rejection.

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Akhil P.C. filed a suit against Kochummani. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit because the plaintiff was absent and did not have representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Akhil P.C. (30 years years) Palakkaparambil House, Kizhakkambalam Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunad Taluk

Defendants

Kochummani (62 years years) Palakkal House, Edathala P.O., Edathala Kara, Aluva East Village, Aluva Taluk, Pin – 683561

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff being absent and no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases