Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T.146/2023

Case between Ajimon P.M. vs Anil Soman regarding U/s 138, 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-III, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
Case Code No.
146
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajimon P.M. filed a case against Anil Soman under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed a withdrawal petition which was allowed, leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complainant's withdrawal petition was allowed, resulting in the acquittal of the accused. The bail bonds were cancelled and the accused was set at liberty.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant's withdrawal petition was allowed, resulting in the acquittal of the accused. The bail bonds were cancelled and the accused was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a withdrawal petition which was allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajimon P.M.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Soman
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binoy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowed withdrawal petition.
Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Bail bonds are cancelled and accused set at liberty.
Evidence:
His bail bonds are cancelled and set at liberty.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P. Mohanan vs Aisha Razak regarding acquittal under Section 257 CrPC.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III, Kanjirappally
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mahim Basheer vs Ramsil Kasim regarding withdrawal petition and acquittal.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III, Kanjirappally
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M. S. Sebastian vs Binil Cheriyan regarding U/s 138, 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-III, KANJIRAPPALLY
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between A. J. Khalid vs E. M. Unniyankutty regarding charges abated due to death
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-III, KANJIRAPPALLY
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Goodwill Chitty Funds vs P. A. Joseph regarding acquittal under Section 257 CrPC.
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-III, KANJIRAPPALLY
Criminal Case Defendant Won