Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.776/2018

Case between Ajeesh Vijayan vs Johnson Varghese regarding Review of Counter Claim

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha.K.Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-24
Duration
Case Code No.
776
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajeesh Vijayan filed a review petition to restore a counter claim that was previously rejected due to non-payment of court fees. Johnson Varghese is the respondent in this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitions filed by the defendant, condoning the delay in filing the review petition and restoring the previously rejected counter claim.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitions filed by the defendant, condoning the delay in filing the review petition and restoring the previously rejected counter claim.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds for allowing the petitions in the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds for allowing the petitions in the interest of justice.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay that occasioned is not willful. On perusing records, this court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground for allowing the above petitions in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 1/2023 in RP 89/2023 is allowed. Delay of 49 days condoned. RP 89/2023 is allowed. Order dated 08.09.2023 rejecting counter claim is set aside. Counter claim restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajeesh Vijayan
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson Varghese
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Latheesh Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binitha James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Delay of 49 days condoned.
Evidence:
IA 1/2023 in RP 89/2023 is allowed. Delay of 49 days condoned.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counter claim restored to file.
Evidence:
RP 89/2023 is allowed. Order dated 08.09.2023 rejecting counter claim is set aside. Counter claim restored to file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Smt. Radha Joshy regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won