Case Summary
Ahammed kutty filed a suit against Hussain for money. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's name called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ahammed kutty
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hussain
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ahammed kutty vs Hussain regarding money
Case Code Year
Case between Ahammed kutty vs Hussain regarding money