Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 87 OF 2014

Case between Achikkulath Raveendran vs Ramachandran et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Achikkulath Raveendran and Sumathi, filed a suit for injunction. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Achikkulath Raveendran
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sumathi
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramachandran
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmaja
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajitha Kumari
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayanthi
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.A.Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.A. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Achikkulath Raveendran vs Ramachandran et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Achikkulath Raveendran vs Ramachandran et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won