Case Summary
The plaintiffs Abraham, Thomas, and Eldho filed a suit against defendants Sunny and N M Paily. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the suit was not pressed and subsequently dismissed it.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was not pursued by the plaintiffs.
The suit was not pursued by the plaintiffs.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was not pursued by the plaintiffs.
The suit was not pursued by the plaintiffs.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiffs did not press their suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit Not pressed. Memo filed. Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abraham
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thomas
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Eldho
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunny
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N M Paily
- Party Age
- 70
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathew Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ciju I S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P T Geevarghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit Not pressed. Memo filed. Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abraham et al vs Sunny et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Abraham et al vs Sunny et al regarding dismissal of suit