Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn 1078/2015

Case between Abida vs Moideenkutty et al regarding setting aside a decree

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2015-07-23
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 27 days
Case Code No.
1078
Case Closed
Thu, 07/23/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abida filed a restoration petition seeking to set aside a decree dated 6-3-2015.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition stands allowed, setting aside the decree dated 6-3-2015.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree set aside
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition stands allowed, setting aside the decree dated 6-3-2015.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Cost paid and petition allowed. For steps last chance given on 10-8-2015.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Cost paid and petition allowed. For steps last chance given on 10-8-2015.
Supporting Evidence
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed. Decree dated 6-3-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 1078/15. For steps last chance. 10-8-2015

Judgment Evidence:

Petition stands allowed. Decree dated 6-3-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 1078/15.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abida
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rabiay
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kadeeja
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahmath
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabiya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthafa
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathimakutty @ Malumma
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hamzakutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Enikutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Salam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saidalavi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varikkottil Sakeena
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aliyappu @ Alikutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunhappu
Plaintiffs Documents
Cost paid
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
T.R.Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Decree set aside
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration petition allowed to set aside the decree dated 6-3-2015
Evidence:
Petition stands allowed. Decree dated 6-3-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 1078/15.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cost paid
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The cost was paid for the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 04/04/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/23/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Kuvvaparambath Bhaskaran regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Poppat Prakash Lakshman Jadav vs Suchetha regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won