Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 279 OF 2017

Case between Abdurahiman vs Mohammedkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-21
Duration
1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdurahiman filed a suit seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants to prevent trespass, property damage, and obstruction of way to his property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing, committing waste, or obstructing the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: Defendant and his men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing to plaint schedule property and forcibly widening the B schedule way...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdurahiman (58 years) Kallunthiruthi House, Cheriyamundam amsom, Desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, PIN - 676 111.

Defendants

Mohammedkutty (70 years) Yarathingal House Abdul Khader (45 years) Saidalavi (Age not specified years) Abdul Azeez (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from trespassing, property damage, or way obstruction
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: Defendant and his men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing to plaint schedule property and forcibly widening the B schedule way...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of plaintiff's ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by Smt. Rajeswari.M.R., Advocate Commissioner regarding the property.
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan submitted by Smt. Rajeswari.M.R., Advocate Commissioner regarding the property.
Reference:
C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 03/21/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases