Case Summary
Abdul Nazer filed a restoration petition against multiple respondents, and the court allowed the petition on the condition that a cost of Rs.8000/- be paid by Abdul Nazer to the respondent by the specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed restoration petition with condition of cost payment
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition on the condition of payment of Rs.8000/- by Abdul Nazer to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Nazer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.T.Muahmmed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Salmanul Faris
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Faizal
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Fasin
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh Pookayil, P. Sree Haji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Not mentioned
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allowed the restoration petition with cost payment condition
Evidence:
Petition stands allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2016