| Niyamam AI

Displaying 471 - 475 of 21810

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thampi vs Balan et al regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 552/2019

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sujith vs Renjith et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS. No. 665/2021

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vimalamma vs Sabeena Beevi et al regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 763/2017

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-7 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mohanan Pillai vs Akhil regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 154/2024

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shamnad vs Anilkumar regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 166/2022

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to the non-payment of required batta for filing or proceeding.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the financial means of respondents.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Dismissals often occurred because plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps in their cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Cases were regularly dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?