| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 4336 - 4340 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Haneefa vs Mammu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 393 OF 2005

Tirur

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parapadikkal Muhammedkutty et al vs Sainudheen regarding Mandatory Injunction and Arrears of Rent

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 106 OF 2018

2019-09-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shriram Transport, Finance Co. Ltd vs Shihab .K.P et al regarding execution of warrant

Execution Petition

EP 262/2018

Malappuram

2019-09-30

0 years, 10 months, 15 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Rasheed et al regarding Execution Proceedings

Execution Proceedings

KLML130010392018

Malappuram

2019-09-30

0 years, 9 months, 9 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mumthas vs Faisal regarding eviction of shop room

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 14 OF 2019

Tirur

2019-09-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide required documents to support their case.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying the necessary fees known as batta.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Dismissals occurred frequently when the petitioner failed to appear in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?