| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3676 - 3680 of 22070

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between V. Chandramathi et al vs V. Chandramathi et al regarding decree as per the terms of the compromise

OS.No.2098 /2011

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V. Chandramathi et al vs V. Chandramathi et al regarding joint compromise decree.

Civil Suit

OS.No.2098/2011

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-06

approximately-13 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s A.R.G Apparels regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.553/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-06

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Krishna Kumar vs Vivek.M regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.83/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-07

approximately-4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mubarak vs Soman regarding vacating ad interim injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1819/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9728

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required court fees, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the means or claims, leading to dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to follow necessary legal procedures, such as issuing notices or representation in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Some cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs appearing for their hearings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?