| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3406 - 3410 of 21957

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Jerald Metals regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1228/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-03

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Preethi Paul vs Dr.Sheela.K.Pillai regarding injunction

Injunction

OS.No.645/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Murukesh.M vs Sandeep.G.P regarding conditional attachment of property

Civil Suit

OS. No.651/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-04-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayakumar vs Vineeth kumar regarding declaration, Recovery of Possession and injunction reliefs.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.949/2018

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-04-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nandukumar I.M. vs M S.Shailan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Injunction

O.S. No.1847/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9673

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Batta Fees

Plaintiffs often dismissed due to non-payment of necessary fees for court processes, resulting in default judgments.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Cases commonly dismissed because plaintiffs did not appear in court or represent themselves effectively.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed to issue required notices, leading to dismissal of petitions for lack of proper process.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?