| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3181 - 3185 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between M/s Infocom Software Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 575 /2020

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-03-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.K. Prasad vs O.D. Thomas et al regarding non prosecution

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 712/2020

Ernakulam

2025-03-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bakers vs J. B Basmathi regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No . 831/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M R Sonaratnan et al vs Gopi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 853 /2012

Ernakulam

2025-03-07

approximately-12 years 25 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Cherub Dairy Products Pvt. Ltd. vs Safeer S., Safiya V. A. regarding dismissal as not pressed

O.S No. 911/2024

2025-03-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Plaintiffs frequently neglected to take steps to issue notices to respondents, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?