| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2776 - 2780 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Abdul Azeez regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 356/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-31

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sukumari Gopinath et al vs Rossily Joseph et al regarding injunction for property boundaries

Civil Suit

O.S No. 378/2014

2025-07-31

approximately-11 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Madan Mohan vs Mohammed Habeeb M regarding a civil suit.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 571/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.J.Mary vs Shaju K.R et al regarding property dispute.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 606/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-31

approximately-2 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between City Heights vs George Abraham Pachayil regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 162/2022

Ernakulam

2025-06-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in their petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Petitions were dismissed when plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps to advance their cases.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Several cases saw dismissals due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?