| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2731 - 2735 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between St.Mary’s Convent vs Saidhu Mohammed et al regarding a compromise agreement

Civil Suit

O.S No. 454/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V. R. Chandrashekaran Ilayidom vs Appukuttapanikar J.R. et al regarding settlement in mediation.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 529/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vilsy Dasan vs Naveen Security Services et al regarding civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 638/2025

Ernakulam District

2025-07-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Venu Kuppuswamy regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 711/2024

ERNAKULAM

2025-07-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mr. Kishore P. George vs M/s. SINGNET SOFTWARE SOLLUTIONS PRIVATE LTD et al regarding salary arrears.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 827/2022

Ernakulam District

2025-07-28

approximately-8 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide necessary evidence or documentation to prove their claims.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary court fees or batta.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absent Petitioners

Several cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent from court proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Steps Taken

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps in their cases, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absent Petitioners

Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?