| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2661 - 2665 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between V Devashikhamony vs Abdul Nazar Sait et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1233 /2017

Ernakulam

2025-07-16

approximately-3 years 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anshad Kallukulam regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1307/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-17

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Binu B M regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1336 / 2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-17

approximately-8 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.K. Hariharan vs Amalu C.S. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Eviction Petition

R.C.P. No. 47/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-16

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between B.K. Santha vs Jishnu P M regarding eviction from rental property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 81/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-16

approximately-7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required fees for proceeding, resulting in automatic dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Numerous cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to take necessary legal actions, such as issuing notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed when the plaintiffs failed to appear in court or were otherwise absent.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?