| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2586 - 2590 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mr.Badarudheen et al vs Mr. Rabu. J. Vayalatt et al regarding settlement of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1266/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. SANUBER vs Mr. DEEPAK P. P. regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

E.P No. 142/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Subash Tola vs Maju P.S. regarding Rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 86/2023

Ernakulam

2025-07-07

approximately-1 month 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Sri. Rahul Augustine et al regarding Suit for Realization of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 38/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-07

approximately-8 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Partner, "Naagaas" vs M/s. Menz City Mens Wear regarding suit dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 120/2020

Ernakulam

2025-07-07

approximately-5 years 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous petitions were dismissed for default due to the failure to pay required batta fees.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence from court hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitions were often dismissed for not taking necessary procedural steps like issuing notices.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?