| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2241 - 2245 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kerala Vyapari Vyavasayi Ekopana Samithi Pachalam Unit et al vs P. C. Jacob et al regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1480/2014

Ernakulam

2025-09-17

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Mr. A. T. Rajeev et al vs Dr. Neetu Ann John regarding Rent Control.

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 64/2025

Ernakulam

2025-09-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Pachalam Merchants Union et al vs P. C. Jacob et al regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 755/2015

Ernakulam

2025-09-17

approximately-10 years 11 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Catapult Creative Services Pvt Ltd. vs M.C.Muralidharan regarding dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 114/2023

Ernakulam

2025-09-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Maggie et al vs Eljove C regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 148/2023

Ernakulam

2025-10-24

approximately-2 months 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the required court fee (batta) for processing their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Dismissals often occurred due to plaintiffs not presenting sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs commonly failed by not taking necessary procedural steps to move their cases forward.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were frequently dismissed when plaintiffs were absent during court proceedings, lacking representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?