| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2166 - 2170 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Kalyani K et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 552/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-09

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Organic Brand Promotion Services Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s. Dream Flower Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd. regarding declaration and consequential reliefs.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 684/2021

Ernakulam

2025-09-09

approximately-4 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.J.Jacob et al vs Aswathy Shaji regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 136/2025

Ernakulam

2025-09-09

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Latha R vs Jerome PG regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 454/2025

Ernakulam

2025-10-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda Vyttila Branch vs Karavattakudy Prakash Prasith regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 786/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-10

approximately-4 years 1 month 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Dismissals often occurred due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?