| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20441 - 20445 of 21888

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Secretary vs Athyattil Abdul Shukkoor et al regarding loan satisfaction.

Execution Petition

EP 356/2015

Malappuram

2017-02-17

1 years, 4 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ittikaparambil Palakkal Muhammed Kutty's Son vs Mujeeb et al regarding eviction.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 256 OF 2013

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed vs Moideenkutty et al regarding decree execution

Execution Petition

EP 320/2015

Malappuram

2017-02-16

1 years, 4 months, 7 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Majeed vs Sulaiman regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.47 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mohanan vs Pottammal Narayanan Ezhuthachan et al regarding restoration application

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptr 597/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-02-15

0 years, 11 months, 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often neglected to issue necessary notices to defendants, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Judgments were frequently dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during court proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?